ISO-IEC-27001-LEAD-AUDITOR-CN HIGH PASSING SCORE & STANDARD ISO-IEC-27001-LEAD-AUDITOR-CN ANSWERS

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN High Passing Score & Standard ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Answers

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN High Passing Score & Standard ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Answers

Blog Article

Tags: ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN High Passing Score, Standard ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Answers, Reliable ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Mock Test, Exam ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Quizzes, Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Test Pattern

If you purchasing our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN simulating questions, you will get a comfortable package services afforded by our considerate after-sales services. We respect your needs toward the useful ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CNpractice materials by recommending our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Guide preparations for you. And we give you kind and professional supports by 24/7, as long as you can have problems on our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN study guide, then you can contact with us.

Prep4away guarantee ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Exam Success rate of 100% ratio, except no one. You choose Prep4away, and select the training you want to start, you will get the best resources with market and reliability assurance.

>> ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN High Passing Score <<

Standard ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Answers | Reliable ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Mock Test

As we know, our products can be recognized as the most helpful and the greatest ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN test engine across the globe. Even though you are happy to hear this good news, you may think our price is higher than others. We can guarantee that we will keep the most appropriate price because we want to expand our reputation of ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Preparation test in this line and create a global brand about the products. What’s more, we will often offer abundant discounts of ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN study guide to express our gratitude to our customers. So choose us, you will receive unexpected surprise.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) Sample Questions (Q59-Q64):

NEW QUESTION # 59
我們在 ACT 中做什麼 - 來自 PDCA 循環

  • A. 採取行動不斷提升人員績效
  • B. 採取行動持續監控流程績效
  • C. 採取行動持續監控流程績效
  • D. 採取行動持續改善流程績效

Answer: D

Explanation:
In the Act phase of the PDCA cycle, the process is reviewed and evaluated based on the results from the Check phase. The actions taken in this phase aim to continually improve the process performance by addressing the root causes of problems, implementing corrective and preventive actions, and updating the process documentation1. Reference: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor (Information Security Management Systems) | CQI | IRCA


NEW QUESTION # 60
審計人員無法辨識 A 公司隱藏了不安全的網路架構。這是什麼類型的審計風險？

  • A. 固有的
  • B. 檢測
  • C. 控制

Answer: B

Explanation:
Detection risk refers to the risk that the auditor will not detect a material misstatement or significant issue within the organization's ISMS. In this case, the auditor's inability to identify Company A's insecure network architecture is a detection risk.
References: ISO 19011:2018, Guidelines for auditing management systems


NEW QUESTION # 61
您正在作為審核組組長進行您的第一次第三方 ISMS 監督審核。您目前與審核團隊的另一位成員一起在被審核方的資料中心。
您的同事似乎不確定資訊安全事件和資訊安全事件之間的差異。您嘗試透過提供範例來解釋差異。
下列哪三種場景可以定義為資訊安全事件？

  • A. 硬碟機在建議更換日期之後使用
  • B. 員工在輪班結束時未能清理辦公桌
  • C. 組織未通過第三方滲透測試
  • D. 未收到付款的承包商刪除了高階管理人員 ICT 帳戶
  • E. 組織收到網路釣魚電子郵件
  • F. 組織的惡意軟體防護軟體可防止病毒
  • G. 不滿意的員工未經許可更改薪資記錄
  • H. 組織的行銷資料被駭客複製並出售給競爭對手

Answer: D,G,H

Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27000:2018, which provides an overview and vocabulary of information security management systems, an information security event is an identified occurrence of a system, service or network state indicating a possible breach of information security policy or failure of safeguards, or a previously unknown situation that may be security relevant1. An information security incident is a single or a series of unwanted or unexpected information security events that have a significant probability of compromising business operations and threatening information security1. Therefore, based on this definition, three examples of information security incidents are:
* A contractor who has not been paid deletes top management ICT accounts: This is an example of an unwanted or unexpected information security event that has a significant probability of compromising business operations and threatening information security, as it may result in loss of access, data, or functionality for the top management.
* An unhappy employee changes payroll records without permission: This is an example of an unwanted or unexpected information security event that has a significant probability of compromising business operations and threatening information security, as it may result in financial fraud, legal liability, or reputational damage for the organization.
* The organisation's marketing data is copied by hackers and sold to a competitor: This is an example of an unwanted or unexpected information security event that has a significant probability of compromising business operations and threatening information security, as it may result in loss of confidentiality, competitive advantage, or customer trust for the organization.
The other options are not examples of information security incidents, but rather information security events that may or may not lead to incidents depending on their impact and severity. For example:
* The organisation's malware protection software prevents a virus: This is an example of an identified occurrence of a system state indicating a possible breach of information security policy or failure of safeguards, but it does not have a significant probability of compromising business operations and threatening information security, as it is prevented by the malware protection software.
* A hard drive is used after its recommended replacement date: This is an example of an identified occurrence of a system state indicating a possible breach of information security policy or failure of safeguards, but it does not have a significant probability of compromising business operations and threatening information security, unless it fails or causes other problems.
* The organisation receives a phishing email: This is an example of an identified occurrence of a network state indicating a possible breach of information security policy or failure of safeguards, but it does not have a significant probability of compromising business operations and threatening information security, unless it is opened or responded to by the recipient.
* An employee fails to clear their desk at the end of their shift: This is an example of an identified occurrence of a service state indicating a possible breach of information security policy or failure of safeguards, but it does not have a significant probability of compromising business operations and threatening information security, unless the desk contains sensitive or confidential information that is accessed by unauthorized persons.
* The organisation fails a third-party penetration test: This is an example of an identified occurrence of a system state indicating a possible breach of information security policy or failure of safeguards, but it does not have a significant probability of compromising business operations and threatening information security, unless the penetration test reveals serious vulnerabilities that are exploited by malicious actors.
References: ISO/IEC 27000:2018 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Overview and vocabulary


NEW QUESTION # 62
您正在作為審核組組長進行您的第一次第三方 ISMS 監督審核。您目前與審核團隊的另一位成員一起在被審核方的資料中心。
您目前所在的大房間被分成幾個較小的房間，每個房間的門上都有一個數位密碼鎖和刷卡器。您注意到兩個外部承包商使用中心接待台提供的刷卡和組合號碼進入客戶的套房進行授權的電氣維修。
您前往接待處並要求查看客戶套房的門禁記錄。這表示只刷了一張卡。你問接待員，他們回答說：“是的，這是一個常見問題。我們要求每個人都刷卡，但尤其是承包商，一個人往往會刷卡，而其他人只是'尾隨'進來”，但我們知道他們是誰接待處簽到。
根據上述情況，您現在會採取下列哪一項行動？

  • A. 提供改進機會，承包商在訪問安全設施時必須始終有人陪同
  • B. 提供改進機會，在接待處設置大型標牌，提醒每個需要進入的人必須始終使用刷卡
  • C. 針對控制 A.7.6「在安全區域工作」提出不符合項，因為尚未定義在安全區域工作的安全措施
  • D. 告訴組織他們必須寫信給承包商，提醒他們需要適當使用門禁卡
  • E. 確定是否有任何額外的有效安排來驗證個人對安全區域（例如閉路電視）的存取權限
  • F. 由於尚未與供應商就資訊安全要求達成一致，因此針對控制措施 A.5.20「解決供應商關係中的資訊安全問題」提出不符合項
  • G. 不採取任何行動。無論有什麼建議，承包商都將始終以這種方式行事
  • H. 由於安全區域未充分保護，因此針對控制 A.7.2「物理進入」提出不符合項

Answer: H

Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which specifies the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an information security management system (ISMS), control A.7.2 requires an organization to implement appropriate physical entry controls to prevent unauthorized access to secure areas1. The organization should define and document the criteria for granting and revoking access rights to secure areas, and should monitor and record the use of such access rights1. Therefore, when auditing the organization's application of control A.7.2, an ISMS auditor should verify that these aspects are met in accordance with the audit criteria.
Based on the scenario above, the auditor should raise a nonconformity against control A.7.2, as the secure area is not adequately protected from unauthorized access. The auditor should provide the following evidence and justification for the nonconformity:
* Evidence: The auditor observed two external contractors using a swipe card and combination number provided by the centre's reception desk to gain access to a client's suite to carry out authorized electrical repairs. The auditor checked the door access record for the client's suite and found that only one card was swiped. The auditor asked the receptionist and was told that it was a common problem that contractors tend to swipe one card and tailgate their way in, but they were known from the reception sign-in.
* Justification: This evidence indicates that the organization has not implemented appropriate physical entry controls to prevent unauthorized access to secure areas, as required by control A.7.2. The organization has not defined and documented the criteria for granting and revoking access rights to secure areas, as there is no verification or authorization process for providing swipe cards and combination numbers to external contractors. The organization has not monitored and recorded the use of access rights to secure areas, as there is no mechanism to ensure that each individual swipes their card and enters their combination number before entering a secure area. The organization has relied on the reception sign-in as a means of identification, which is not sufficient or reliable for ensuring information security.
The other options are not valid actions for auditing control A.7.2, as they are not related to the control or its requirements, or they are not appropriate or effective for addressing the nonconformity. For example:
* Take no action: This option is not valid because it implies that the auditor ignores or accepts the nonconformity, which is contrary to the audit principles and objectives of ISO 19011:20182, which provides guidelines for auditing management systems.
* Raise a nonconformity against control A.5.20 'addressing information security in supplier relationships' as information security requirements have not been agreed upon with the supplier: This option is not valid because it does not address the root cause of the nonconformity, which is related to physical entry controls, not supplier relationships. Control A.5.20 requires an organization to agree on information security requirements with suppliers that may access, process, store, communicate or provide IT infrastructure components for its information assets1. While this control may be relevant for ensuring information security in supplier relationships, it does not address the issue of unauthorized access to secure areas by external contractors.
* Raise a nonconformity against control A.7.6 'working in secure areas' as security measures for working in secure areas have not been defined: This option is not valid because it does not address the root cause of the nonconformity, which is related to physical entry controls, not working in secure areas. Control A:7.6 requires an organization to define and apply security measures for working in secure areas1.
While this control may be relevant for ensuring information security when working in secure areas, it does not address the issue of unauthorized access to secure areas by external contractors.
* Determine whether any additional effective arrangements are in place to verify individual access to secure areas e.g. CCTV: This option is not valid because it does not address or resolve the nonconformity, but rather attempts to find alternative or compensating controls that may mitigate its impact or likelihood. While additional arrangements such as CCTV may be useful for verifying individual access to secure areas, they do not replace or substitute the requirement for appropriate physical entry controls as specified by control A.7.2.
* Raise an opportunity for improvement that contractors must be accompanied at all times when accessing secure facilities: This option is not valid because it does not address or resolve the nonconformity, but rather suggests a possible improvement action that may prevent or reduce its recurrence or severity. While accompanying contractors at all times when accessing secure facilities may be a good practice for ensuring information security, it does not replace or substitute the requirement for appropriate physical entry controls as specified by control A.7.2.
* Raise an opportunity for improvement to have a large sign in reception reminding everyone requiring access must use their swipe card at all times: This option is not valid because it does not address or resolve the nonconformity, but rather suggests a possible improvement action that may increase awareness or compliance with the existing controls. While having a large sign in reception reminding everyone requiring access must use their swipe card at all times may be a helpful reminder for ensuring information security, it does not replace or substitute the requirement for appropriate physical entry controls as specified by control A.7.2.
* Tell the organisation they must write to their contractors, reminding them of the need to use access cards appropriately: This option is not valid because it does not address or resolve the nonconformity, but rather instructs the organization to take a corrective action that may not be effective or sufficient for ensuring information security. While writing to contractors, reminding them of the need to use access cards appropriately may be a communication measure for ensuring information security, it does not replace or substitute the requirement for appropriate physical entry controls as specified by control A.
7.2.
References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems


NEW QUESTION # 63
將正確的責任與第二方審核的每位參與者配對：

Answer:

Explanation:

Explanation:

The correct responsibility with each participant of a second-party audit is:
* Prepares the audit report: Audit Team Leader. The audit team leader is responsible for coordinating the audit activities, communicating with the auditee and the customer, and preparing and delivering the audit report that summarizes the audit findings and conclusions1.
* Prepares audit checklists for use during the audit: Auditor. The auditor is responsible for collecting and verifying objective evidence during the audit, using audit checklists as a tool to guide the audit process and ensure that all relevant aspects of the audit criteria are covered1.
* Supports an auditor and provides feedback on their experience: Auditor in training. The auditor in training is a person who is learning how to perform audits under the supervision of an experienced auditor. The auditor in training supports the auditor by observing and participating in the audit activities, and provides feedback on their experience to improve their skills and competence1.
* Follows-up on audit findings within an agreed timeframe: Auditee. The auditee is the organisation that is being audited by the customer or a third party on behalf of the customer. The auditee is responsible for providing access and cooperation to the auditors, and for following up on the audit findings within an agreed timeframe, by implementing corrective actions or improvement measures as needed1.
* Provides an independent account of the audit but does not participate in the audit: Observer. The observer is a person who accompanies the audit team but does not participate in the audit activities. The observer may be a representative of the customer, a regulatory body, or another interested party. The observer provides an independent account of the audit but does not interfere with or influence the audit process or outcome1.
* Escorts the auditors but does not participate in the audit: Guide. The guide is a person who is appointed by the auditee to assist the audit team during the audit. The guide may escort the auditors to different locations, facilitate access to information and personnel, or provide clarification or explanation as requested by the auditors. The guide does not participate in the audit or influence its results1.


NEW QUESTION # 64
......

Of course, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN simulating exam are guaranteed to be comprehensive while also ensuring the focus. We believe you have used a lot of ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN learning materials, so we are sure that you can feel the special features of ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN training questions. The most efficient our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Study Materials just want to help you pass the exam more smoothly. For our technicals are checking the changes of the questions and answers everyday to keep them the latest and valid ones.

Standard ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Answers: https://www.prep4away.com/PECB-certification/braindumps.ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN.ete.file.html

Let us make our life easier by learning to choose the proper ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN study materials, pass the exam, obtain the certification, and be the master of your own life, not its salve, PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN High Passing Score Question NO 5: Do I need to provide shipping details, Once people mention the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN exam, most of them will feel unhappy and depressed, There is no doubt that the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN exam preparatory will be the best aid for you.

This is an example from a Design Strategy Workshop ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN at the Institute of Design with Professor Vijay Kumar, Business competition has always been a prominent element in the landscape of analysts, Standard ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Answers directors, entrepreneurs, executives, founders, managers, and planners, among others.

Hot ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN High Passing Score 100% Pass | Professional Standard ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Answers: PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版)

Let us make our life easier by learning to choose the proper ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Study Materials, pass the exam, obtain the certification, and be the master of your own life, not its salve.

Question NO 5: Do I need to provide shipping details, Once people mention the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN exam, most of them will feel unhappy and depressed, There is no doubt that the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN exam preparatory will be the best aid for you.

Facing pressure examinees should trust themselves, everything will go well.

Report this page